The Analyzed Capitalist

WHAT ARE YOU ANALYZING?

 

Freud's Couch. photo credit: roberthuffstutter - flickr

 

You are not your executive role--that executive mantle you put on. 

You're the person--the one who operates the machinery of that role.  Why analyze the executive?  The entrepreneur?  The capitalist?  You play out the personal while in that professional role.  Trying to keep from losing yourself in that role--from forgetting you are a person separate from that role. 

It's important that you analyze this.  Psychotherapy, psychoanalysis, coaching; executives that have complex lives--that operate at high levels of effectiveness--have always taken time to analyze the person behind the role.

 

Why?  The organization is a group of persons.  Professionals who are persons playing out the personal in their professional roles.  Understanding that organizations are a collection of people--people operating within their roles.  Individuals that are always playing out the personal in the professional arena.  how could they not?  They're who they are and that is what's made them successful.

 

Again, why?  Those behavior patterns, life scripts, routines, and groves scored into your personality and neural pathways have made you successful--until they don't.  When things change, when you change, when time changes--everything can change and what worked may no longer work.  To stay effective and on top of your particular game; you need a few tools.

 

This is becoming the analyzed capitalist.  Being self-reflective.  Being reflective about the organization.  Analyzing your own motives and behaviors.  Being introspective. 

 

You achieve.

You realize you can achieve more.

You take this "you"--your sense of self,

Your mind

Your experiences

with you.

You achieve in your many roles,

behind these roles

will alays be you.

 

 

How can self analysis make achieving harder?  Easier?  When does an executive want another person to help in self reflection?  Coaching?  Psychotherapy?

 

 

 

 

 

MAKE IT COUNT

photo credit: DVIDSHUB--flickr

A little while ago I was watching the Military Channel series, Navy SEALs Training: BUD/s Class 234.  Most striking were two seeming contradictory messages instructors were giving.

 

• It pays to be a winner.   

Winning is often seen as a solitary effort.   About having your fate in your own  hands.  Our movies are set to the theme of the hero and of the heroic journey.  The Summer Olympics that are going on right now are broadcast within this heroic context.  Individuals are profiled, their trials and foibles highlighted, and the glory sweeter as they overcome and achieve excellence even as everyone understands it took a team for them to make their mark in history.
 

• You won't survive without your team.

In a country like the U.S., being part of a team can be seen as disappearing as an individual to become a unit that operates as a singular entity without individual exceptionalism.  This conflict about being an individual and being a team member is played out in sports teams dominated by individuals striving to stand out--and apart from their team.

The series depicted a BUD/s training task which had boat teams lifting up telephone poles and running with them.  Something that clearly can only be done as a team.  When the instructors spot someone not putting in maximum effort the whole boat team suffers.  Yet if instructors spot team members excelling at individual tasks without regard to the team, again, the whole team suffers. 

Over and over again the instructors rewarded both individual and team winners.  And also punished individual efforts that sacrificed team goals as well as individuals hiding within the team and allowing the team to pickup their slack.

The individual must perform and the boat team must work together.  The difficulties endured my many individuals and teams during the BUD/s training revealed these contradictions and gives clues to the cultural conflicts that occur when simultaneously seeking to take advantage of the power of the group as well as the heroics of the individual.

You'll have to start working in groups if you ever hope to accomplish big things.  There is no question that each individual member must make their effort count for the team to succeed.

 

 

Do the cultural themes like the heroic journey of the entrepreneur or the icon of the cowboy of the American West make it harder of individuals to succeed in a project driven world? 

When does the time come for an individual to take over from a struggling team to try and make something happen?  Does winning trump learning the value of teamwork?